DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY TO GRANT CREDIT ON SAVING AND LOAN COOPERATIVES USING COMPARISONS OF TOPSIS AND SAW METHOD

نویسندگان

چکیده

Cooperative is one of the institutions engaged in financial sector with business providing savings and loan funds to its members improve welfare community's economy however currently there are still many errors that occur calculation process it takes a very long time, so we need system can simplify selection determining decision. This research aims support decision for eligibility customers by comparing two, be determined which method more relevant implemented case grant credit. In application, this uses comparison two methods, namely Technique Order Preference Similarity Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods. At design stage, model development flow used as an illustration operation has been carried out based on analysis. Based results discussion, concluded TOPSIS SAW methods inequality final seen from ranking process. The test show produces value 0.82% named lintang highest, while 0.65% highest value, recommended solutions system.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Selection of Optimum Tunnel Support System Using Aggregated Ranking of SAW, TOPSIS and LA Methods

The selection of optimum support system is a key step in the successful design operation of tunneling, rock mass stabilization and minimization of plastic zone extension around a tunnel. In this context, it is not sufficient to rely only on the experiences of design engineers, but taking all effective measures and parameters is necessary to do a proper choice. In this paper, multi attribute dec...

متن کامل

Product Development Decision Support System Customer-Based

Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been traditionally used as a planning tool primarily for product development and quality improvement. In this context, many people have used QFD for making decisions on how to prioritize critical product areas from a customer perspective. However, it is the position of the author that the QFD process can be viewed as a decision support system that would enc...

متن کامل

selection of optimum tunnel support system using aggregated ranking of saw, topsis and la methods

the selection of optimum support system is a key step in the successful design operation of tunneling, rock mass stabilization and minimization of plastic zone extension around a tunnel. in this context, it is not sufficient to rely only on the experiences of design engineers, but taking all effective measures and parameters is necessary to do a proper choice. in this paper, multi attribute dec...

متن کامل

the innovation of a statistical model to estimate dependable rainfall (dr) and develop it for determination and classification of drought and wet years of iran

آب حاصل از بارش منبع تأمین نیازهای بی شمار جانداران به ویژه انسان است و هرگونه کاهش در کم و کیف آن مستقیماً حیات موجودات زنده را تحت تأثیر منفی قرار می دهد. نوسان سال به سال بارش از ویژگی های اساسی و بسیار مهم بارش های سالانه ایران محسوب می شود که آثار زیان بار آن در تمام عرصه های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و حتی سیاسی- امنیتی به نحوی منعکس می شود. چون میزان آب ناشی از بارش یکی از مولفه های اصلی برنامه ...

15 صفحه اول

Sensitivity Analysis for Quantitative Decision Making Methods: Topsis and Saw

Abstract The quantitative multiple criteria decision making methods are practical to use in decision support systems. In this paper we analyses the quantitative multiple criteria decision making methods and sensitivity analysis methods usage in decision support systems. Both species of these methods are strongly mathematically based. We take notice of sensitivity of these methods to initial dat...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Jurnal Teknik Informatika

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1979-9160', '2549-7901']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jutif.2022.3.5.369